The first thing to note is that many of these debates wouldn't occur if theists didn't appear in order to try to convert atheists usually to some form of Christianity. Some atheists seek out debate, but many are content to simply discuss things often not religious issues, in fact amongst themselves. The fact that an atheist responds to prompting from a theist does not suggest that there is anything more to atheism than the absence of belief in gods.
The second thing to note is that there is a legitimate
interest among nonbelievers in educating people about atheism, agnosticism, and
free-thought. There are quite a few myths and misconceptions about these
categories and people are justified in trying to dispel them. Once again, the
desire to spread accurate information does not suggest anything further about
atheism.
Nevertheless, there is a category of debate which does
involve something beyond atheism, and that is when debates are engaged by
atheists not simply as nonbelievers, but as nonbelievers who are specifically
working to promote reason and skepticism. In this manner, the specifics of the
debate may be about theism and religion, but the purpose of the debate is
supposed to be about the encouragement of reason, skepticism, and critical
thinking any encouragement of atheism is incidental to that. When participating
in such discussions, it is important for atheists to remember that not all
theists are wildly irrational and illogical if that were so, it would be much
easier to simply dismiss them.
Some are genuinely attempting to be reasonable, and some
manage to do a decent job. Treating them as if they never heard of logical
arguments will only serve to put them on the defensive in the end, and it is
unlikely that you will accomplish anything. This raises a very important
question: if you are engaging a theist in a debate, why are you doing it? You
must understand what your goals are if you have any hopes of getting anywhere.
Are you just looking to win an argument or vent your negative emotions about
religion and theism? If so, you have got the wrong hobby.
Are you looking to convert people to atheism? In the context
of any one discussion, your chances of achieving that goal are slim to none.
Not only are you unlikely to succeed, but there is not even all that much value
in it. Unless the other person begins adopting a habit of reasonableness and
skeptical thinking, they won’t be much better off as an unskeptical atheist
than as an unskeptical theist.
No comments:
Post a Comment